While it is text based, every tools has its quirks so it is nice that it is also on iOS so that they are similar. It is file based, supports things like wiki links (though they could use improvements on generating links), and it is pretty good all together. Like I said, I do use Notebooks and I think it is criminally under appreciated in the reddit communities I frequent. I do use it both on iOS and macOS, and when I need those more advanced editing, I will often hop over to BBEdit or the like. Though it doesn't have those other features. Let me know if I should put these requests on GitHub as well. The same would go for tables, if a feature like I said above is ever implemented. I would much prefer it if LaTeX blocks stay unrendered as long as (a part of) it is within a selection. This (visually) creates an interrupted selection highlight and makes understanding what exactly is copied unintuitive in my opinion. I'm not too fond of having to enter a preview mode everytime though, would it be possible to automatically render these tables when not "focussing" on them (by having the cursor inside the table)? I don't know how else to describe it, but I would prefer it much more if they work like the LaTeX $$ blocks (rendered when cursor is elsewhere, expand to reveal the "source code" when clicked, re-render when cursor moves outside again).Įdit: Another thing I just noticed is that when selecting a bunch of lines of text with a LaTeX block somwhere in the selection, the block will first expand when the cursor is moved over the block, but when expanding the selection some more past the block, the rendered LaTeX will appear again. If you decide to try Nota, I would love to get your feedback! You can write to us at that makes sense and it works now! Thank you so much for the feedback, ideas, and knowledge. Otherwise, it will worsen the experience. This is a problem that we need to iterate multiple times in order to get right. When I write some heading I will add some synonyms so I can find them better. In our own notes, we are actually adding the synonyms manually. We were thinking of having a maximum of 1-2 synonyms per word (the most probable ones) for common words (top 10k words). Could you not allow the user to specify their own synonyms in a setting somewhere? Might be a quick win. Synonyms would be a killer feature, though not sure how you'll do that since my synonyms will be different than someone else's. Sounds like you need a lemmatizer in your indexing, which would give you singular/plural/past/present results for cheap. However, this is also hard and we are still experimenting with it. We predict the possibility of the current char being a typo and try to find the word you were trying to type.
We also are currently working on fixing typos. Fuzzy search should fix that, so I'm glad you have it.
where you get one letter wrong and suddenly no results.